Another academic on video explicitly says she wants to help ISIS. When will these stains on America be stopped? Watch the video.
White House doesn’t dispute it
John McCormack reports: In an appearance on ABC’s This Week, Indiana governor Mike Pence defended his state’s Religious Freedom Restoration Act by noting that Barack Obama had voted for the same law as an Illinois state senator.
“Josh, you just heard the governor say right there this is the same law, he says, that Barack Obama voted for as a state senator back in Illinois.”
— This Week Host George Stephanoplous to White House press secretary Josh Earnest
“The Religious Freedom Restoration Act was signed into federal law by President Bill Clinton more than 20 years ago, and it lays out a framework for ensuring that a very high level of scrutiny is given any time government action impinges on the religious liberty of any American.” Pence said. “After last year’s Hobby Lobby case, Indiana properly brought the same version that then-state senator Barack Obama voted for in Illinois…
View original post 100 more words
The Indiana Religious Freedom bill is necessary to ensure that the government cannot overreach. For instance, it would stop the egregious fines and restriction on Christian bakers who refuse to violate their faith. It isn’t about being gay, who is gay, or the wherefores and why’s of gayness.
For years, Christians have been tolerant of satanic displays, atheist bullying and, dare I go there; religious persecution. The point is that we are all free to believe what we believe. It is the Gay lobby and the Atheist lobby etc that are the real promoters of discrimination on Christians.The feminists aren’t far behind (Insert hand clap hear because I can). And, they know it. Further, the Huffington Post has released an article promoting safe places for “non-white” citizens. I hate to break it to you but safe places is just a promoting theory for Jim Crow Laws which translated means let’s segregate.
Muslims want to live in America but many (not all) denounce American rules, laws, faiths and everything else.The Muslim issue is that their faith permits no tolerance of any other faith…period.
The atheist doctrine is, simply put, my faith for me but no faith for thee. That is just plain arrogant bullying to censor what another might believe and feel.
I don’t hate gay people. In fact, I love a couple (a couple is all I actually know). My bad I guess. I love heterosexual people too. But who I love, what I think and what faith I have comes from a place where my free will sits. And, that isn’t legislative and you cannot regulate it.
FInally, why is it bad to enact a religious freedom bill in 2015 that is essentially the same that Bill Clinton enacted as president? Could it be because Gov. Pence, a reublican governor, did it? Could it be that Clinton was a democrat? Or, more to the point is it because his last name is CLINTON?
“Religious freedom restoration act. Provides that a state or local government action may not substantially burden a person’s right to the exercise of religion unless it is demonstrated that applying the burden to the person’s exercise of religion is: (1) essential to further a compelling governmental interest; and (2) the least restrictive means of furthering the compelling governmental interest. Provides that a person whose exercise of religion has been substantially burdened, or is likely to be substantially burdened, by a state or local government action may assert the burden as a claim or defense in a judicial proceeding, regardless of whether the state or a political subdivision of the state is a party to the judicial proceeding. Allows a person who asserts a burden as a claim or defense to obtain appropriate relief, including: (1) injunctive relief; (2) declaratory relief; (3) compensatory damages; and (4) recovery of court costs and reasonable attorney fees.”
Considering the known details of the exercise and the accelerating anti-constitutional lawlessness of the federal government, it is hardly unreasonable to express concerns…
A massive U.S. military drill dubbed “Jade Helm 15” lists Texas, Utah, and part of California as “hostile” or “insurgent pocket” territory. The unclassified information about this drill is causing widespread alarm nationwide, with more than a few analysts suggesting it may be some sort of exercise practicing to impose martial law on Americans fed up with an out-of-control federal government. During the exercises, which will take place over the summer, Special Forces from various branches of the military will work with local law-enforcement in scenarios that, to critics at least, sound suspiciously like they are aimed at subduing rebellious American civilians and states amid a civil war or large-scale unrest. The federal government issued a response dismissing the concerns and saying that the training is to…
View original post 574 more words
With all the crises in the world it’s priceless when something comes across your news feed and actually makes you laugh out loud. So, I’m sharing the laughs.
It amazes me daily how much ignorance the intolerant choose to exhibit on such a grand stage as the internet. I commented on a post from The Intercept rebuking Israel for spying. The Intercept headline said NSA documents proved it. Give me a freaking break! It’s only morally or politically correct when the NSA does it? Furthermore, isn’t The Intercept continually outing everyone who spies? They just outed New Zealand and Canada.
More to my point, when I commented I was told I was a traitor (to whom I am still wondering), had my head in my ass and condoned killing children. I get attacked a lot. If it’s true then okay. But, it isn’t true.
So, here is a screen shot of what I actually said:
Oh the bills…the bills…the bills. Oh the lamentations, lawsuits and the speeches on/from the house floor, circulating through social media and falling flat on their well-intentioned faces.
Thus far introduced or intended:
1. A bill to repeal the Patriot Act.
2. Four bills aimed at protecting the 2nd amendment.
3. The new FOIA Act.
4. Suing to block Amnesty.
5. The Iran Bill.
But wait, there’s more…
Take the advice from McConnell that states should just ignore the new EPA restrictions set forth by executive order. But, Washington had an app for that. (First three words of the definition of app “a self-contained program”) [colloquial] Deny FEMA funds for states. It’s been too long for me to be aghast and I am surely not naive. Try as they might congress is still do nothing.Congress has no might.
As long as souless people like Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Hillary Clinton and John Boehner are in power the American citizenry is going to lose. They are going to lose huge.
None of the aforementioned bills etc will be voted in. NONE of them. Unless congress can summon what’s left of their duty to their country, we’re screwed.
It’s long past time to break the impasse in Washington. And, doing that requires very brave men and women who are not afraid to wake up and tell the seeds of America’s destruction they need to go. Go, they must.
It is congress’ duty “IN CONGRESS, JULY 4, 1776 … it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such … all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States.”
They need not ask “Pretty please?”
A Federal Communications Commissioner long-opposed to the net neutrality stance adopted in new regulations by the agency last month asked Congress Tuesday to cut FCC funding necessary to enforce the new rules.
“Congress should forbid the commission from using any appropriated funds to implement or enforce the plan the FCC just adopted to regulate the Internet,” Commissioner Ajit Pai said in a prepared statement before Congress. “Not only is this plan bad policy; absent outside intervention, the commission will expend substantial resources implementing and enforcing regulations that are wasteful, unnecessary, and affirmatively detrimental to the American public.”
Pai and FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler appeared before a House budget committee to testify on the agency’s new rules, which regulate Internet service providers similar to public utilities under Title II-style authority derived from the 1996 Telecommunications Act. Under the regulations, ISPs are banned from blocking content or setting up…
View original post 320 more words